"The vast majority of people don't understand where their water comes from and it's not a problem or an issue until the water stops," Tom Whitmer said during Tuesday evening's Mohave County Republican Forum meeting.
Whitmer, the Arizona Water Resource Department Regional water planner, covered a variety of water-related issues in the talk.
...
Area aquifers
Some of the results of the study show that the Hualapai Valley aquifer which supplies some of Kingman's water has about 3.8 million to 10.1 million acre-feet of water and recharges at a rate of 2,000 to 3,000 acre-feet a year, Whitmer said. The Sacramento Valley aquifer, which serves both Golden Valley and Kingman, has about 3.6 million to 9.5 million acre-feet of water and recharges at a rate of about 1,000 to 4,000 acre-feet per year. The Detrital aquifer, which serves White Hills and parts of Dolan Springs, has about 1.5 to 3.9 million acre-feet of water and recharges at a rate of about 1,000 acre-feet a year, he said.
Recharge rates are affected by elevation, temperature and rainfall, Whitmer said. The problem comes when people withdraw more water from an aquifer than what is being recharged into it.
In at least two of Mohave County's aquifers, depletion could be a problem, he said. The Detrital aquifer is in the best shape, with less than 300 acre-feet a year withdrawn.
The Sacramento Aquifer is bordering on unsafe yield, he said. Approximately, 3,700 acre-feet of water is withdrawn from the aquifer a year. With a recharge rate of only 1,000 to 4,000 acre-feet a year and the current drought, the area could be taking out more water than is going in.
The Hualapai Valley Aquifer is in the most danger, he said. Approximately, 9,050 acre-feet are taken out of the aquifer every year. The recharge rate of 2,000 to 3,000 acre-feet a year can't keep up, Whitmer said.
Be sure to read the whole thing, I copied from the latter part of the article mostly. Full disclosure, the only information I have about this meeting where this gentleman shared information comes from the article I linked above. I'm certain that plenty more interesting bits of information was available... at least I'd hope so (it is not an in depth sit down and interview type of article).
As readers may know this 'water' issue we are having in the Kingman area becomes a topic of great conversation from time to time.
Time to take a closer look at the information shared in the KDMiner.com article.
In at least two of Mohave County's aquifers, depletion could be a problem, he said.
Could be a problem?? To be fair I'd like to know if something more specific was said. Size of the problem... how soon the problem... that sort of thing.
With a recharge rate of only 1,000 to 4,000 acre-feet a year and the current drought, the area could be taking out more water than is going in.
Again with the 'could be' stuff. I should have been at the meeting... long drive, but maybe I would have had these questions answered.
The other thing I'd want to know...
The Sacramento Valley aquifer, which serves both Golden Valley and Kingman, has about 3.6 million to 9.5 million acre-feet of water
Does that mean, on the low side, that there is 3.6 million acre feet of water that can be used??
These are answers I loved to know more about, even if it means adjusting my views on my perception of the 'water problem' we are supposed to be having.
Coming up on two years ago I wrote this blog post and I ask that you give it a read if you have the time. Covers similar examples of putting math to the data that is known, just like I am going to do with the information shared in the KDMiner.com article.
More disclosure, all data collected for the math equations that follow come from either linked media articles or linked government documents from Arizona web sites.
We will solve for the following...
the results of the study show that the Hualapai Valley aquifer which supplies some of Kingman's water has about 3.8 million to 10.1 million acre-feet of water and recharges at a rate of 2,000 to 3,000 acre-feet a year
...
Approximately, 9,050 acre-feet are taken out of the aquifer every year.
I'm up for a challenge... so we'll solve for how long it would take to use up ONLY HALF the water resources in the Hualapai Valley aquifer. Not only that, we will assume that it will never, ever, rain again in Mohave County -- so no recharge.
Still not good enough. So we will double the amount of water used annually, measured in acre feet, and round up to 20,000.
This is going to be simple math -- but double check my work anyway.
Half of the low estimate of 3.8 million acre feet equals 1.9 million acre feet.
Add Zero for recharge
Rate of water used equals 20,000 acre feet annually.
1.9 million acre fee divided by 20,000 acre feet annually equals... 95 years.
95 years to use HALF. Should I say it?? Fine, much can happen in 95 years. Leaving me to ask the question... who are we to decide on a non problem now, for what might not even be a problem then??
Unless the questions I shared earlier are answered, and the answers allows me to be swayed by facts, the math says we don't have a water resource problem. The only potential problem I see is a water resource delivery infrastructure problem... the kind that tax payers pony up for when no one else wants to invest in the area. As a tax payer I know that future costs for such improvements will be needed, even if the area is not growing. Defraying the costs with an additional amount of people equal to the current population would certainly make those high cost types of improvements easier to afford.
And this is why it is a fundamental growth issue. If the community was really thinking about helping our future generations of Kingmanite's (not even born yet) then we should be working hard and competing for local investment and development. IF the planets lined up just right and everything fell into place (which it certainly will not) it is possible that the folks here today wouldn't have to pay for any of it for years. Accounts could be set up to save money for future infrastructure needs perhaps?? (yeah, I'm being waaaayyyy too optimistic there)
I posted on the KDMiner.com site yesterday this tidbit...
Now you watch... the folks that will respond to me won't attack the math or the facts.
That was validated quickly. Too bad because it might actually be an interesting discussion and the sharing of the facts would be something I'd look forward to.
Link to more MOCO posts including public data regarding local water supply.
2 comments:
Todd,
I can agree with you on the length of time we have in the Detrital and Sacramento Aquifer, even the Hualapai. But my concern is that if the mines are sucking only a couple acre feet per year, what are they doing with the water they are discharging? That filter system they are using was built in the early 60's. Can a filter plug up in 50 years? I kinda think so. Have you an idea where we can find out the amounts of contamintaion or not? My concern is that if they keep discharging contaminated water we will have a huge aquifer in about 20, 30, 50 years that is totally contaminated. We may not be able to stop the use of water but we can surely stop the contamination of it. I'd like to knowwhere we can get this information.It may be too late if that mine has dumped tons of contaminates in the ground. It may be well on its way to our Sacramento aquifer.
Thanks for commenting TC. If you have some information about what is happening with water resources at the mine, feel free to share it.
This is not the first time I've seen someone comment about the water use at the mines, however I do not have any solid information about it (either a media source or something more official from a government body).
I don't like to comment on issues where I don't have information. I can't link to someones concern about the subject. I want my readers to view the same information that I have used to come to any conclusions... and I simply do not have enough data on that.
I wouldn't want anyone poisoning our current or future water resources either, and am surprised that the 'enlightened' water worry warts are not making a stink about the issue you have brought up.
Post a Comment